Wednesday 29 May 2013

Gender Gap In Film Criticism

I stumbled upon this article over at cinemablend.com - http://www.cinemablend.com/new/Study-Claims-There-Significant-Gender-Divide-Film-Criticism-37744.html

As disappointed as I am about this, it is not surprising. I can hardly name more than two female film critics  off the top of my head even though there are more, and that is from my film studies of Laura Mulvey and Kaja Silverman. This issue, and the lack of female directors around the world- not that I’m saying there isn't any. But name a female director besides Kathryn Bigelow (first female to win an Oscar  for directing in 2009), Sofia Coppola, Sarah Polley and the late Nora Ephron? 


"When you read a film review, do you pay close attention to the byline? Does the gender of the critic alter how you feel about the film, or the review? And do you only read reviews by critics of a certain gender? 

These are some of the questions being bandied around thanks to the results of a San Diego State University study claiming that men continue to “dominate” the field of film criticism and, in turn, tend to gravitate toward films that are written and/or directed by other men. THR shares a few of the study’s most interesting (and controversial) findings, while acknowledging that the study’s window of observation only took place over a two-month period this past spring. Over that time period, Martha Lauzen used Rotten Tomatoes to track more than 2,000 reviews written by the sites “Top Critics.” Her findings included: 

 - Men account for 78% of the Top Critics reviews on RT, writing 82% of filed reviews.

- A “large proportion” of the total reviews written by female critics were “about films directed by and/or written by at least one woman." 

- Men, also, disproportionately reviewed films written by or directed by men, though given the dominance of male directors and screenwriters in the film industry, that number would be hard to skew.


Reaction has been all over the place on social media in response to this report going public. Some have expressed outraged. Others aren’t shocked to find women underrepresented in the critical community. But few have come up with suggestions on how to reverse the trend. What do you think? Should there be more female film critics? Why do you think there aren't more women writing film criticism? And did you ever notice a dominant gender in film criticism before this study was released?" 


Another aspect of this study that is disappointing, again not all together surprising is that male critics mainly reviewed films written and directed by other men. And although women supporting other women is always nice, as seen in the statistic of female critics  reviewing films with a female director or writer, it shouldn't matter in the end. As naive and idealistic as this sounds, it shouldn't matter and it should be about the film and the art in the end. Maybe critics should watch edited copies of the film without opening credits and take away the director/writer information in the press kit,  or any  knowledge of the director/writer until after watching and reviewing the film, only knowing the synopsis and cast. 

Dream on right...

Keep trying to break that glass ceiling ladies!  

Thursday 16 May 2013

10 Seriously Insane Ways Famous Movie Actors Got Into Character

I thought I would share this article I found from 'whatculture' website. If you haven't checked this site out before, do so!! I've lost hours of my life because of the this site.

http://whatculture.com/film/10-seriously-insane-ways-famous-movie-actors-got-into-character.php


I've also always been fascinated by method acting in my film studies and general love of cinema. I also find it funny that  in my general knowledge, it seems that male actors in particular have gravitated towards this more than female actors. I wonder why. 


I was aware of most of these, but there were a couple on the list I already know. There are plenty of other examples as well. 


10. Daniel Day-Lewis – My Left Foot






You could easily write an entire list for the extreme ways in which Daniel Day-Lewis prepares for his roles in films, but let’s just get him out the way early shall we? So you have Bill the Butcher from Gangs of New York, in which Day-Lewis trained to be an actual butcher and refused to wear coats in the height of winter on set as it wasn’t in keeping with his character. He also supposedly demanded that everyone refer to him as Mr. President for the recent Lincoln and refused to break character whilst on set.
Then there is his most extreme and possibly most famous example of his extreme measures. It came about for the filming of the 1989 film My Left Foot in which Lewis played Christy Brown, a cerebral palsy sufferer who can only control one limb – his left foot.
To prepare, Day-Lewis (allegedly) refused to leave his wheelchair, demanded that he be force fed and broke to his ribs from remaining hunched over for too long a time, refusing to break character to fully understand the effects of the affliction Christy Brown endured.
This is probably the most famous example of insane ways actors get under their fictional/factual counter parts’ skin, yet with three Oscars to his name for best actor (the only actor to ever obtain such), the man must be doing something right.

9. Heath Ledger – The Dark Knight






It really is hard to believe, but when Christopher Nolan announced he had cast Heath Ledger in the Joker role for The Dark Knight, fan boys were up in arms. Known prior to it for playing pretty boy roles (a Knights Tale, 10 Things I hate About You) and the tortured souls (Brokeback Mountain, Monsters Ball), offering him the role of the Clown Prince couldn’t have been more off the mark. Or at least, so the world initially thought.
Heath Ledger locked himself in a hotel room, isolated himself from the outside world (including his own family) took prescription drugs by the bucket load and descended into a complete personal hell in order to really encapsulate the anarchy that comes with playing The Joker.
Ledger told reporters he “slept an average of two hours a night” while playing “a psychopathic, mass-murdering, schizophrenic clown with zero empathy. I couldn’t stop thinking. My body was exhausted, and my mind was still going.”
“Prescription drugs didn’t help.” he also added.
After tragically dying from a combination of said prescription drugs and exhaustion, the former Joker, Jack Nicholson, infamously stated he knew the reason for his Ledger’s demise.  “Well, I warned him.” – Cryptic and ill timed it may have been, but unfortunately for the world, it is a statement that wasn’t too far from the truth about the dangers of actors losing themselves in the dark world of method acting.

8. Christian Bale – The Machinist



There is method acting or getting into character, and then there is risking your life to evoke a sickening, harrowing feeling with an audience. Christian Bale’s character Trevor Reznik is one of the most memorable film performances for decidedly shocking and incorrect reasons.
The film itself is fantastic, a dark portrayal of a man losing his mind due to insomnia is worthy of any film lovers collection. But the staggering look of Bale can, for some, make it almost unwatchable. Bale went all the way down to 110 pounds (7 stone) for the role, supposedly living off a cup of black coffee, a can of tuna and an apple as his daily diet. The producers stepped in after Bale stated he wanted to lose more and reach 100 pounds, yet fearing for his health, they simply told him that it wasn’t a good idea.
Bale also took up smoking to curb his appetite, all equalling a very bad advert for healthy living, yet the results are a skeletal Bale who acts out of his saggy skin to make the role so believable. The film itself obtained critical acclaim, yet the dramatic weight loss shuns any spotlight on how good the film and its story actually are. Still, when a 30 year old man weights the same as an average 8 year old girl, it really is hard to look anywhere else.


7. Robert De Niro – Taxi Driver



De Niro lived and trained with Jake Le Motta for Raging Bull and Le Motta stated that he became so good at boxing that he could probably switch professions. But you probably all know about that one.
A much more extreme method of getting into character is actually changing your job to suit the role you were about to play. Taxi Driver is as much about driving a car around New York as The Godfather is about guns - there is much more depth to it than that. But old Bobby became a New York Cabbie none the less, to understand the clientèle that a taxi driver endured he obtained a provisional license and did pick ups for a few weeks.
New York in 70′s was a very different place to what it is now. Before the Bloomberg clean up, it was widely reported in the 70′s to be a much more hostile, dirty and frightening place to be due to rising crime levels and unsafe living conditions, a feeling that Taxi Driver really encapsulates. De Niro could have easily been attacked or robbed as many NYC cabbies were back then, yet by actually partaking in the job he was attempting to replicate, it is a real testament to Robert De Niro’s craft as an actor.

6. Tom Cruise – Collateral





You are the most famous movie star working today, your films still manage to top the box office irrespective of quality and you have one of the most recognizable faces in the world. So how do you hide your face to become a generic, unrecognizable everyman?
With the help of an aging beard and different hair cut to make his look totally unlike anything he had done before, Cruise attempted to ‘blend’ into the role of a hitman Vincent in Michael Mann’s Collateral. Playing a man who stalks his victims and takes them out without looking any different than your average Joe is role that Cruise went one step further to achieve.
For a few months before shooting, he worked in LA as a FedEx delivery man, attempting to float into normality by delivering packages around bustling Los Angeles to become anything but the most famous movie star on the planet.
Cruise spoke about the experience stating “I got my mission; go in and deliver this package to this place. Then go to this area, buy a coffee and sit down and just talk. It was just a great acting exercise. I’m a very good stalker now too, which is excellent.”


5. Marlon Brando – The Men




No list about getting into character in extreme ways or method acting would be complete, or worth a grain of salt, without featuring the Granddaddy of method; Marlon Brando.
For the 1950 anti war film ‘The Men’, Brando played a paralyzed war vet who tries to adjust to the world without the use of his limbs. This was his onscreen debut that treated the world to the birth of a star with an incredibly realistic performance of such a harrowing, anti war sentiment laden film. At the time, this kind of film was a shocking watch.
An acting student of  Lee Strasberg, the revolutionary founding father of method acting (who also trained Paul Newman, Robert De Niro, Al Pacino, James Dean, Dustin Hoffman and Jack Nicholson to name a few), Brando popularized ‘the method’ in the 50’s and went on to use it throughout his career, forever the cornerstone and epitome of being at one with your character.
For this his first film, he prepared for it by reportedly lying in bed for a month in a veterans’ hospital. Immobilized and unable to look himself, Brando started a trend that has since stretched itself out across the very best of the acting world.

4. Johnny Depp – Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas




According to legendary film folklore, Johnny Depp approached Hunter S Thompson before filming Fear and Loathing, asking him if he wouldn’t mind if he lived with him for a while, shadowing his every move and becoming life long friends in the process. Thompson agreed, told him to live in his basement for the foreseeable, but under no circumstances smoke any cigarettes down there.
Depp agreed, yet found it odd that Hunter S Thompson, a man renowned for hard drugs use, crazy antics and most aptly, chain smoking asked him to avoid smoking cigarettes in his basement. Depp decided to sit down on a rickety old chair and spark up anyway.
After a few tokes of his cigarette, he noticed that the ash tray he was using (and the man-made seat he was perched in) was nothing but stacks of dynamite. He screamed for Thompson to come down to his basement and confirm whether or not it was real dynamite. Thompson replied that Depp ‘Could have blown us all to bits!’ Smoking does indeed kill, but not if you live as dangerously as Thompson, it would appear that he has much more exotic ways of kicking the bucket.
After his ill timed suicide in 2005, Johnny Depp bank rolled Thompsons life long request to have his ashes shot out of a cannon – A truly explosive friendship from start to finish and one that is proof that sometimes life truly is stranger than fiction.

3. Dustin Hoffman – Marathon Man



Probably one of the most famous lines uttered by the legendary Laurence Olivier was not one spoken in one of his many great roles, but the supposed quip he aimed at Dustin Hoffman of the back of him training to play Babe in the 1976 film Marathon Man.
The story goes that a history student obsessed with running gets placed unintentionally into a nightmare world of international conspiracy involving some stolen diamonds, an exiled Nazi (Olivier) and a really bad trip to the dentist. I know, right? Crazy. The words ‘Is it safe?’ will forever reverberate in your mind when you visit the dentist after this film.
Hoffman, a method actor by trade, got so prepared for the character he played that he lost 15 pounds after running up to four miles a day to get in shape for the demanding role. Legendary Producer Robert Evans claimed that Hoffman would never come into a scene faking the heavy breathing required, and that he would simply run half a mile right before director John Schlesinger yelled ‘action’ to make the scene more believable. This is something that supposedly led to the famous line Olivier fired at him; ‘Why not try acting? It is much easier.’ A moment in cinematic history that Hoffman vigorously denies.
But why would you admit it? One of the greatest character actors of all time destroyed the supposed ‘method’ acting in favour for his preferred way of just pretending to be someone else with one single, now infamous, line. Either way, both performances are solidified as two of the best to come out the 1970′s.

2. Adrian Brody – The Pianist




Adrien Brody is a man who has suffered for his art. He is also a man, whose fall from grace is one of the biggest on the Hollywood timeline, being the youngest person to win an Oscar for Best Actor for his fantastic portrayal  in Roman Polanski’s The Pianist, only to now slump in a swarm of mediocrity and poor film choices.
To prepare for the role of Wladyslaw Szpillman, and in order to feel more connected with the feeling of loss he felt the role required, Brody sold his possessions and moved away before the production of the film.
“I gave up my apartment, I sold my car, I disconnected the phones, and I left,” he says. “I took two bags and my keyboard and moved to Europe.”
His humble outlook towards the role he played, along with the need for the film world to see him at the top of his game is warranted in his sentiments towards the experience:
“The beauty of what I do is it gives you the opportunity to give up who you are and attempt to understand someone else, another time, other struggles, other emotions. If you really do experience a lot of them, you connect and it’s very rewarding.”
Brody’s disconnection with his material life style, is the best example of the positive moral reasons that more actors should partake in this ‘method in the madness’ theory of acting.

1. The Entire Cast – One Flew Over the Cuckoos Nest



Strange one this, with the exception of it’s main star, Jack Nicholson, the cast of One Flew Over committed themselves to a psychiatric ward to get into character for the 1975 Oscar littered film. One of the strongest points to this film is the superfluous acting of the supporting cast that includes Danny DeVito, Christopher Lloyd and Brad Diouf.
When you concentrate on the message of the film, it really hammers home the reason these actors divulged in such a method and why Nicholson avoided it. Nicholson is playing the guy who isn’t at all mentally ill, a man who by his own admissions doesn’t need mental help, and who is simply there to get out of work in jail. For that reason, he did not commit himself and thus isolated his connection to the others who were portraying mentally ill patients.
You can see how much of an effect this had on the stars of the film by watching the making of documentary that comes along with the DVD/Blu Ray version of the film. They claim that there wasn’t any acting on show here and that by committing themselves to be a mental asylum, it is nothing but real. We see a distant Sydney Lassick (who plays one of the most interesting fore fronting characters in Cheswick) looking out the window of the mental institute and contemplating his own life and what it means to be institutionalized. His distant look and far away speech simply shows how close he has come to the edge and echoes what the very film tries to portray: In the battle for freedom, does conforming to authority make one more insane, or is it the freedom of expression that sets you free?

Monday 13 May 2013

Film Review: The Great Gatsby


Directed by: Baz Luhrmann. Starring: Leonardo DiCaprio, Toby Maguire, Carey Mulligan, Joel Edgerton and Elizabeth Debicki. Screenplay by: Baz Luhrmann and Craig Pearce. Adapted from The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerarld.



On paper it sounds perfect. Take one of the greatest 20th century novels about the roaring 20’s and match it with Baz Luhrmann’s grandiose style. Cast (arguably) one of the best working actors as the doomed lead Jay Gatsby- the personification of the rise and fall the American dream. VOILA! An instant hit! Equaling in 51.1 million in its opening weekend; or how much Gatsby spends on one of his parties.

In a way it is perfect how polarizing my feelings and reviews in general have been for the fifth big screen adaptation of The Great Gatsby.

On the one hand you have Luhramann perfectly capturing the obsceneness of how decadent the rich played and lived during this era, as described in Fitzgerald’s novel.  People were prospering, WWI forgotten and years until the depression and WWII.  The American dream was alive and well.  On the other hand, Luhrmann doesn’t have the same critical tone and irony Fitzgerald does.  

This is ironic in itself because Fitzgerald and his wife Zelda were part of that rich circle he criticises.

Luhrmann has a more sympathetic tone towards his characters as well, even if they are suppose to be selfish and empty and carless, or sad and pathetic.  It would have just been nice if he focused a little more on characterization and lingered a little more on the more climatic moments.

His focus seemed to be more on style than substance.

I also felt that having this film in 3D was more distancing and distracting at times and overall not needed.  As well as having Nick Carraway in a sanitarium dealing with his depression and alcoholism by being given a typewriter as part of his therapy, (in the book, Nick is just remembering and retelling the story on his own) bookending the beginning and end of the film felt the same as Christian in Moulin Rouge.

What did Luhramann do right?

His casting.

Leonardo DiCaprio, despite playing a little younger (Gatsby is 32) while Leo is closing in on 40 (typing that made me want to cry a little) is a great Gatsby. He captures his smooth, sleek and charismatic side, while also seeing a more uncertain, tortured, and even pathetic at times in his unwavering dream and vision of Daisy.  He also has one of the best and fitting entrances in a film- complete with slow-mo, close-up, fireworks and swelling music.

Carey Mulligan, despite my first thoughts of being too obvious in her casting is also a great Daisy Buchanan. Daisy is described as “precious,” “airy” and even “light”. Always wearing white and in sparkling jewels. Mulligan is bubbly like the champagne that’s always present, but also captures her sadness, confusion and selflessness.  Daisy is a polarizing character. You can see her as a product of the time and her position in society, or a high-school like mean girl who in the end cares for only herself.

I also must add as a side note that despite Leonardo and Cary acting well in their respected roles, their onscreen chemistry as lovers fell flat to me.

Toby Maguire is not a bad actor and he plays the stories narrator, Nick Carraway pretty much by the book. Nick is not a rich and confident man like Gatsby and Tom Buchanan. Nick is arguabluy the empty vessel  for viewers or readers to place themselves in, since he is retelling the story. Nick is the quiet, shy, good guy who just wants to live his life in peace. We don’t know too much else about him.  This could have just been me, but by casting Maguire, I felt a little like I was watching a 1920’s version of Peter Parker, before he becomes Spiderman.

Rounding out the strong cast is Joel Edgerton as the brutish Tom Buchanan and Elizabeth Debicki as the Katherine Hepburn like Jordon Baker.

I personally like Luhrmann’s use and blend of music and music genres for his films. To me it is the equivalent to what Tarantino does with his music, yet Luhrmann tends to get raked over the coals for it. I did not find it overly distracting having Jay Z (a producer of the film and friend to DiCaprio) play in the background, among other contemporary artists.

What else did Luhrmann do right?  Having costume designer Catherine Martin handle the wardrobe. Absolutely stunning and singlehandedly in charge of bringing back 1920’s style that is seen in all the high end clothing and jewellery shops. Beautiful production design and set decorations all blend and seen beautifully with cinematography by Simon Duggan.

When all is said and done, this newest adaptation of The Great Gatsby is beautiful to watch and listen to if nothing else.  

As one song from the film’s soundtrack states: “A little party never killed nobody.”