General life has been keeping me from posting as much as I would
like lately and in the near future. Nothing too serious or life threatening,
but as silly as this may sound, I like to think myself in “pre-production” for
the next stage of my life I am attempting to make, or in other words “production.”
As I start to feel ill, and with
Halloween in a day away, I did want to take a little bit of time and share some
of my favourite horror films. I enjoy, or I should say I think horror is more effective when they mess with your mind rather than rely on body count. I admit that I haven’t watched some of the big
classics in the horror genre, but out of the ones I have seen, these are the films that still have
the power to freak me out.
The Exorcist (William Friedkin, 1973)
I
remember the first time I saw this film. It was at a friend’s birthday party in
grade 7 and we were all sleeping over and huddled into her basement late at
night. She whipped out a VHS (yup, VHS!) and popped it into the player.
I
wanted to be brave and act as if this film would not scare me, but I ended up
watching the film through the spaces in-between my fingers that were suppose to
block my view and protect me.
Not
so much.
The
premise, the music, the desperate mother wanting to save her child, the voice
coming from the innocent looking little girl, the images of what she or it was
doing was unlike anything I've seen before. It did more than just scare me and
give me a sleepless night. It unsettled me.
To
this day, even constantly reminding myself “it’s only a film, it’s only a film...” pea
soup and all, it still unsettles me.
The
Shining (Stanley Kubrick, 1980)
Maybe
my control issues are at the heart of choosing these films as ones that scare
me the most. Although The Shiningisn't some gory, slasher type horror film,
the idea of an individual losing control and being possessed by some force is
scary to me.
Add
a father played by Jack Nicholson who is possessed by these forces and trying
to kill his family in an old haunted hotel, with Stanley Kubrick directing an
adaptation of a Stephen King novel, and well...do I have explain more? "All work and no play..."
Along with losing control, another
pattern I see is evil children. Add The Omen (1976) and Rosemary’s Baby (1968) as other films
that freak me out.
I should look into this.
I also want to give honourable mention to Rope (1948)by Alfred Hitchcock. Something about just being plain cold and callous without remorse or care that affects me and freaks me out. Anything like that unsettles me actually.
This trailer doesn't do justice to how awesome this film actually is, it's almost comedic in tone compared to today's standards. To me, this is one of Hitchcock's most under appreciated films.
Based
on the novel of the same name. Adapted and directed by Stephen Chbosky. Stars:
Logan Lerman, Emma Watson, Ezra Miller.
Published
in 1999, film released October 2012
There
are plenty of films that depict and explore the trials, tribulations and themes
of adolescence, and both the book and film The
Perks of Being a Wallflower is one of them. What makes this book and film
stand out differently is its honesty when looking at how messed up teens and
high-school can be, but in the end, we will survive and learn and be messed up
young adults in our messed up post high school life. I mean this in a good way actually. The book
and film in the end is a positive and hopeful message without being overly cheesy
or look down on the reader/viewer.
The
story is essentially about Charlie (Logan Lerrman) who starts his freshman year
of high school after having his best friend from middle school commit suicide.
He soon befriends seniors, Patrick (Ezra Miller) his step-sister Sam (Emma
Watson) and follows the school year. This is all done (in the book) through
letters written by Charlie to an anonymous friend about his experiences,
although there may be guesses and theories to whom he is writing to. The films
shows some of his letter writing, but is essentially told through Charlie’s
perspective.
Despite
the mature subject and being categorized as YA (young adult) the film/book can
be appreciated by non young adults as well.
So
what are some of the mature subject matter? Without getting too spoilerish:
drugs, sex, teen pregnancy, molestation, rape, suicide, homosexuality,
homophobia and bullying.
That
is a lot to explore. This is also complaint that I have read in reviews from
others that the book throws all of this and more in a short time span and is unrealistic.
While reading I didn't feel like this was too much. It was not THAT long ago I
was a teen and plenty of these issues came up in my days in high school. The book looks at all these issues in a
respectful and honest manner. The film
adaptation doesn't explore all of these, but a fair amount in the same way.
It
is a touching story that even with all the heavy issues, it is hopeful in the
end and is more about the power of friendship and the love of family.
Logan
Lerman who plays Charlie does a good job. While I read the book, I knew that
there was something not right with Charlie, that was more than just being shy and
socially awkward. He was just too
sheltered, too innocent for a 15 year old starting high-school. Trust me! I was
sheltered and green as well. The film doesn't explore much of Charlie’s panic
attacks, anxiety, crying fits when he is overwhelmed and his blackouts. As well (for
a lack of a better description) adrenaline rush that makes him able to defend
himself from his bullies and later on a group of football players. It also helps that his older brother is a
college football player and teaches him a thing or two. These outbursts are rare and Charlie is not a
violent person, but linked with his other characteristics, the reader is clued in
more and more that there is something wrong about Charlie that we are not aware
of until the end. This helps to make Charlie a more complex and realistic character.
Lerman gets Charlie’s sensitivities and
sweetness, but in the end, even with his big emotional and mental breakdown, he felt
just like another shy and quiet teenage boy who has a talent for writing. Not
all Lerman’s fault, it is also changes the film makes as well. This was
something done more effectively and impactful in the novel.
Emma
Watson as Sam continues her post Harry
Potter career. In both the book and
novel I tried to see Sam as more than just object of affection. Sam as
more than the free spirited girl who helps Charlie to come out of his
shell and the quirky step-sister to Patrick who loves indy music. There isn't really anything wrong with Sam or
in Watson’s performance. She is nice and
like most teenage girls she has self esteem issues that she tries to fix it by
male attention. Self esteem issues that stem from childhood. Maybe I just have problems relating to these
types of female characters. Yes! I knew and continue to know girls (and women)
like her. Sam is already on her journey
of discovering who she is as an individual. By the end, through her friendships
and experiences as she is on her way to university, she is one step closer to female
independence and accepting the correct type of love. That is
as deep as I can go when it comes to Sam’s character.
The
actor and character in the film that shined the most to me was Ezra Miller as Patrick.
The openly gay teen that is witty, has a zest for life and is cleaver and
mature beyond his age. I know what you thinking! A flamboyant gay male
character...how original? Book Patrick
and Ezra as film Patrick is more than that. Patrick is not flamboyant, but an open
and happy and a mostly self assured person. There is a difference to me. There
is a depth to Patrick that isn't often seen in “supporting” characters in a book.
Ezra brings this to his acting as well in the film. I believe that an entirely separate
book and film can be written about Patrick as well. I've only seen Ezra Miller
in one other film, We Need to Talk About
Kevin, and you can’t show much more versatility and range from playing
Kevin, a deeply disturbed teenage killer, to Patrick. He will be seen next as Leon in a new
adaptation of the classic Madame Bovary
(YAY! Another period piece from a classic novel I’ll watch.) At only 20, this is a career and talent I looking
forward to watching develop.
My
minor complaint about the film is that when Patrick has his breakdown and is at
his lowest, it did not go deep enough. For a period of time he lives off truckers pills and coffee, hooking up with randoms not to feel pain/hate but
love. I understand that you can only do so much in a film adaptation, but
with a character like Patrick, without going into specifics, when he becomes
like this, it is eye opening and a learning experience for the characters and
reader/viewer as well. It is one of the most poignant and saddest moments in
the book and could have been more powerful scene(s) if expanded more in the
film.
I
cannot think of another example where the author of the novel also adapted the
screenplay and directed the film. I think that is interesting and helped
contribute the film’s success in keeping with the spirit and overall themes and
message. It was also a good move to slim down the friendship between Charlie and his English teacher who gives him extra books on the side to further develop his writing and off course, further develop his knowledge of the world and himself. One thing that I found funny was that smoking cigarettes was not in
the film. The characters (including Charlie) smoke. Hollywood is funny when it
comes to depicting youth smoking, and possibly in an attempt to generalize the
time of the film the smoking was cut out. We can have teens take drugs such as
LSD, drink alcohol and be sexually active, but please don’t show them smoking.
I
also loved the look and feel of the film. The novel takes place late 1991 to
the end of summer 1992. Without being obvious the film keeps the time period.
There are no cell phones, laptops, Ipods or any of today’s devices. There are
video tapes and this group of teens make mix tapes for one another. The fashions
in certain scenes also give the time away. The music is awesome and helps to
generalize the time and appeal to many viewers by using music from multiple
decades, including David Bowie’s Heroes
as a theme throughout.
You
can do a quick tumblr search and will find many graphics with lines from The
Perks of Being a Wallflower. Most
notably “We accept the love we think we deserve” and “We are infinite.” That
may go into overkill and cheesy territory but it does attest to the power of the story itself.
I
may sound harsh, but this is a rare case of the film adaptation overall being faithful
the spirit of a book. That is something I have seen a lot of writers, who are fully
aware of unavoidable changes, are afraid of when having their work adapted to
film. This is a example of both novel and book being equal in their own
mediums.
For
fans of Paullina Simon's work, in particular her Bronze
Horseman ( AKA TBH) series, Children
of Liberty, her latest book was both to be excited and nervous about.
Since
this can be thought of as a prequel to TBH series, many already knew how the
story of Jane and Harold Barrington ended, but not the "beginning"
and "middle" parts of their story. I would say that Children of Liberty is the start of their story. It didn't ruin the
book for me, but I thought when Paullina Simons first announced she would be
writing this book that would be more about their actual life together and not as much about how they met. I believe there
is still plenty of their story left to be told. Since I have finished reading Children of Liberty, Paullina has
mentioned in an interview (she’s doing a press tour now) that she is in the
process writing another book about the "middle" of their story. So, I'm
game!
Having
said all that, the "beginning" is pretty good. It has the classic
Paullina Simon’s slow build up and burn. I got more invested and engrossed in the story and
characters the further I read. The longing and the denial of feelings and what
is expected of one, the culture and class clashes, old school thoughts and
traditions during and start of a new century and the industrial revolution,
which brought new opportunities to the world. Both
Harry and Gina rebel in this respect, hence the title Children of Liberty.
That's
another interesting aspect of the story. How Gina Anttaviano, an Italian
immigrant coming to America becomes Jane Barrington. How Harry Barrington, whose decedents arrived
years before to America on the Mayflower and one of the wealthiest families in Boston becomes
Harold Barrington. A couple that moves to Russia years later after the revolution in the fervent belief of a new way of life. Sadly, their optimism also becomes their
downfall.
As
someone who read The Bronze Horseman series
it was interesting and fun to see how characteristics from both mother and
father are late seen in their son, Alexander Barrington/Belov. Harry/Harold’s practicality, sense of reason
and business smarts, mixed with Gina/Jane’s feisty and passionate nature and “go
get ‘em!” attitude.
One
minor complaint I have about this book is all the dialogue and passages about
politics and economics. I see Paullina's background as a financial journalist
and political science major really coming through here. Even more so than in her other books. I understand with the
era that the novel takes place in, and we know later on how politically
involved both Harold and Jane become, the importance of showing the beginnings
of this mindset and way of life they decide later on is needed. I don’t mean
that she should have cut it all out, and it could just be me, but I thought a few times
the conversations and passages with economic and political discussions brought
the pace of the narrative down and I would have liked more scenes with Gina and
Harry just being Gina and Harry- young and discovering their love for one
another.
There
is beautiful writing (as expected by Mrs. Simons) that just rolls off the
tongue like poetry. One particular passage that stuck out for me:
"Love is the strongest and deepest
element in all life. The harbinger of hope, of ecstasy, the defier of all laws,
of all conventions. Man has conquered nations, but all his armies could not
conquer love. Man has subdued bodies, chained the spirit but he has been
utterly helpless before love. High on a throne, yet he will remain poor and
desolate if love passes him by. Love, ladies and gentleman, has the power to
make out a beggar a king."
I
don’t know about you, but that passage just sends shivers down my spine.
If
you are fan of Paullina Simons work or want a good story of two people coming
together and finding love, this is for you.
So
now I wait for the second and more heartbreaking part of Jane and Harold Barrington’s
story.
I just wanted
to play a bit of catch up on here and share some of the books and films that I
have recently seen and read and enjoyed. Some are
not new releases, but a good book or film stands the test of time.
The
Films
Nowhere Boy (2009)–Directed by Sam Taylor-Wood
This
is a great little film about John Lennon’s teenage years. Being raised by his
aunt and reconnecting with his biological mother Julia. All while surviving
high school, discovering his love, passion and talent for music; and meeting a
couple of guys named Paul and George along the way.
Ever
since seeing Anna Karenina at TIFF, I’ve
been on a bit of an Aaron Taylor-Johnson kick, so I’ve been watching and
discovering some of his films. A 19 (now 22) Aaron takes on the task of playing John Lennon. This would be
intimidating to even the most seasoned actor, but Aaron does well with
capturing John’s voice while talking and singing, playing the guitar and
harmonica. He did this all for real.
With
Kristin Scott Thomas playing his influential aunt Mimi, and Thomas Brodie–Sangster
as a teenage Paul, there is a strong supporting cast and of course an awesome
soundtrack needed for a film like this.
This
is a must for any Beatle lover or a lover of music/biopics in general.
Kick Ass
(2010) – Directed by Mathew Vaughn
I
know, I know! I’ve only watched this now! If someone told me Aaron was in this
as well, I would have seen it sooner. I’m going with the better late than never
theory on this one.
I
haven’t read any of the Kick Ass
graphic novels, but the movie stands well enough on its own to explain and set
up the world of not so likely superheroes led by Dave Lizewski AKA Kick Ass
(Aaron). I was really impressed with
Aaron’s versatility in this one. After seeing him play a teenage John Lennon
and Russian Calvary officer, he plays your typical American teenage boy who
dreams of being a superhero and tests his theory of "What if an ordinary person
became a superhero?"
This isn't your typical comic book/graphic novel based film. It knows what it is and
plays on the genre. Add Chloe Grace Moretz as Hit Girl and Nicolas Cage as Big
Daddy and you got yourself a fun film.
Kick Ass 2 is currently being filmed in Toronto, Ont, with a June 2013 release date.
Albert Nobbs (2011) – Directed by Rodrigo Garcia
I
wanted to see this one during last year’s awards season, but forgot and didn't get around until recently. Yes Aaron in this one as well (last one with him, I
promise). This film is about Albert
Nobbs, who is played wonderfully by Glenn Close, a woman who after being
orphaned at 14 decides to live as a man in order to work. The film takes place in a posh Dublin Hotel
where Albert Nobbs is the head butler.
Albert’s life changes after meeting Mr. Page, a painter hired for
a renovation who has more in common with Albert than meets the eye. Albert’s story also
intertwines with the story of Joe (Aaron) and Helen (Mia Wasikowska), two young
lovers who also work in the hotel.
This
is interesting look at late 19th century Ireland where single woman
were discouraged to work in order to support themselves and keep their gay lives a
secret as well.
I also found it interesting that Glenn
Close co-wrote the script and spent years working to get this film financed and
made.
The Books
Here
are some books I recently lead and overall enjoyed. Since it’s Thanksgiving Day here in Canada
and I’m being lazy, I copied and pasted the summaries from the Goodreads
website. www.goodreads.com
Savages-
Written by Don Winslow
Part-time
environmentalist and philanthropist Ben and his ex-mercenary buddy Chon run a
Laguna Beach–based marijuana operation, reaping significant profits from their
loyal clientele. In the past when their turf was challenged, Chon took care of
eliminating the threat. But now they may have come up against something that
they can’t handle—the Mexican Baja Cartel wants in, and sends them the message
that a "no" is unacceptable. When they refuse to back down, the
cartel escalates its threat, kidnapping Ophelia, the boys’ playmate and
confidante. O’s abduction sets off a dizzying array of ingenious negotiations
and gripping plot twists that will captivate readers eager to learn the costs
of freedom and the price of one amazing high.
The
writing style in this book is very different than from what I have read in
past. It is short and fast pace to match the lifestyle these characters live . At times you feel you are reading a text
message with the author’s use of slang in the dialogue. The book also has a
very modern and current feel and look at the world. In particular politics, the
war on (some may argue for) drugs and the tense relationship between American
and Mexico.
Without giving
too much away, my main issues with the book is the ending and the character of
Ophelia, known as O. I didn't see what was so special about her and her
supposed intelligence. It was still a solid book and entertaining read that looks into a world I have next to little
knowledge of.
Despite
the so-so reviews, I didn't get to see the film adaptation by Oliver Stone when
it came out during the summer, but will watch it when it is available to rent
in a couple weeks.
The Red Tent- Written by Anita Diamant
Her name is Dinah. In the Bible, her life is only hinted at
in a brief and violent detour within the more familiar chapters of the Book of
Genesis that are about her father, Jacob, and his dozen sons. Told in Dinah's
voice, this novel reveals the traditions and turmoils of ancient womanhood--the
world of the red tent. It begins with the story of her mothers--Leah, Rachel,
Zilpah, and Bilhah--the four wives of Jacob. They love Dinah and give her gifts
that sustain her through a hard-working youth, a calling to midwifery, and a
new home in a foreign land. Dinah's story reaches out from a remarkable period
of early history and creates anintimateconnection with the past.
Deeply affecting,The Red Tent combines rich storytelling with a valuable achievement in modern
fiction: a new view of biblical women's society.
Now
before you say “A Bible story?” this is a work of fiction inspired by a
biblical story. As said so by the author herself. You do not need to know the book of Genesis or
be Christian or Jewish to understand the story. There is no preaching of any
religion.
In
the end this is a story about Dinah looking back on her life, from even before
her conception. It is a look into an ancient culture and way of life and the
lives of women in that culture. The themes
of family, love found and lost, betrayal and survival are common themes written
time and time again.
A
friend of mine who read this book years ago asked me a question about the last
line, in particular the last word in the book and what it could mean. Off the top of my head I told her it was not
only about Dinah looking back and taking stock of her life, but the message was
for all of us to do that as well. That
no matter where and when you live, to be grateful for the blessings in our
lives and make the most of the hardships as well. I believe that anyone can benefit from that.
Sidenote-
As I mentioned I’m in a lazy mood today, but I have also read (and become
slightly obsessed) with George R.R. Martin’s A Song of Ice and Fire Series, also known as AGame of Thrones. I'm not going to get into every book.
I
have read the first three books and watched the first two seasons of HBO’s equally impressive miniseries adapted from the books. (I'm waiting for a friend to catch up and I don't want to get too ahead of the series). The themes of family, politics, power, loyalty,
betrayal, and love all come together. It is a great series that blends fantasy
in a fictional medieval setting with some memorable characters. It is a brutal
world where the good don’t always win and prosper and even die. As the saying goes,
“Absolute power corrupts, absolutely.”
Or
as Cersei Lannister would say “When you play the game of thrones, you win or
you die.”
The order
of books are:
Book 1-Game of Thrones
Book
2- A Clash of Kings
Book
3- A Storm of Swords
Book
4- A Feast for Crows
Book
5- A Dance with Dragons
Book
6- The Winds of Winter (release date to be announced)
Currently
Reading...
Children of Liberty- Written by Paullina Simons
At the turn of the century and the dawning of the modern
world, Gina from Belpasso comes to Boston’s Freedom Docks to find a new and
better life, and meets Harry Barrington, who is searching for his.
The fates of the
Barringtons and Attavianos become entwined, on a collision course between the
old and new, between what is expected and what is desired, what is chosen and
what is bestowed, what is given and what is taken away.
As America races
headlong into the future, much will be lost and much will be gained for Gina and
Harry, whose ill-fated love story will break your heart.
I have six
chapters left in this book, so I will probably finish it today. Paullina Simons is one of my favourite
contemporary writers. Those that know me personally will know that her Bronze Horseman series are my favourite
books and series that I have ever read. I have read and will read some of her
other novels, but this particular series has affected me unlike any other books. A recommendation for
anyone.
Children of Liberty can be thought of
as a prequel to The Bronze Horseman
series, but can also be read as a standalone book.