Directed
by: Peter Jackson. Stars: Sir Ian McKellen, Martin Freeman, Richard Armitage,
Andy Serkis. Screenplay By: Peter Jackson, Philippa Boyens, Fran Walsh,
Guillermo del Toro. Adapted by J.R.R Tolkien’s The Hobbit. Released:
December 2012
It
has been almost 10 years since the release of The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, and throughout the
decade mummers of an adaptation of Tolkien’s The Hobbit have come and gone. After a rough start getting production going,
including Guillermo del Toro dropping out of directing, Peter Jackson (rightfully
so) decided to lead and bring audiences back to Middle Earth.
I
also want to mention I watched the film in regular 2D. Not 3D, HFR 3D (faster
film rate) or Imax.
It
was nice to go back and the look, tones, textures, special effects and sounds
are all there. I’m fairly certain they filmed in some of the same locations
around New Zealand as well.
The Hobbit: An Unexpected Journey takes place sixty years before The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the
Ring. This time a younger Bilbo
Baggins leads us on our journey. His
so-called burglar skills are called upon by Gandalf the Grey (Sir Ian McKellen)
to help Thorin Okenshield (Richard Armitage,) the rightful king of the Dwarves gain their
land/mountain back after the powerful dragon Smaug took it from them years
before for all the Dwarves gold.
As
mentioned it was lovely to go back, the air of familiarity was there. The Hobbit also blends and references The Fellowship of the Ring very well. The soundtrack, costumes, cinematography and
humour from the previous trilogy is all there. One prime example (without
giving too much away) is a scene between Gandalf, Galadriel, Saruman the White
(Christopher Lee) and Lord Elrond. I couldn't help but have a smile on my face during that scene,
and it wasn't even a funny scene. There
were other moments like that as well.
But
not all is well in the Shire.
I
may have been one of the few that weren't jumping up and down when it was announced
that the original two films planned have been stretched to three films. First off, The
Hobbit is one book and two scripts were penned and essentially filmed. Peter Jackson has also admitted
(beyond the normal changes that come with a film adaptation) that they were expanding
and adding scenes that were mentioned in the appendixes of the book. Yes, this may not be a bad thing overall, but
adding a fluffing a story and stretching it out unnecessarily is a bad
thing. I felt that this was my main issue. The Hobbit on its own isn’t as
complicated a story as The Lord of Rings
trilogy, and I feel as least with An
Unexpected Journey that despite stretching and fluffing, I still can’t name
all the thirteen dwarves. That beyond eating, singing, being gross and messy, and
joking around there was no character development there. I feel that the adding and fluffing takes
away from the story rather than strengthen it. It makes for a weaker film overall. That to me is the difference from the
previous trilogy. It will be interesting
to see how the next two films deal with this.
There were also one too many last minute saves for my liking. Even for a fantasy genre.
There were also one too many last minute saves for my liking. Even for a fantasy genre.
The
performances are lovely and help carry the film as well. Martin Freeman as
Bilbo has the large task of leading and carrying the film. He gets Bilbo’s personality.
Starting out as a home body to reluctant hero and all the emotions and nuances that
come along with it is shown with ease by Martin. His resemblance to Ian Holm,
who plays the older Bilbo, is uncanny. It is understandable why production
waited for Martin Freeman to be free from his Sherlock Holmes schedule.
Sir
Ian McKellen is Gandalf, he was born to play the part and that is pretty much
that.
Richard
Armitage as Thorin balances Bilbo’s and plays against him well. On top of
background it offers a heart and depth to the story. It can be considered that
the friendship between Thorin and Bilbo can be a parallel to Frodo and Aragorn’s,
although not as heart warming. You can see through Armitage’ performance that
yes, Thorin is a leader.
The
stand out performance and my favourite moment of the film is Andy Serkis as Gollum. It
is a motion capture performance during a pivotal scene of the discovery of the ring by Bilbo, (the exception to the stretching
and fluffing) that stays with you. The character is essentially two, both Gollum
and Smeagol. Serkis goes between the two with such ease that many actors can
only dream of. The body posture, voice, eye movements, etc all change back and
forth during a game of riddles. If Andy Serkis wasn’t tired after filming his
scene(s), I was just by watching him.
Despite
a weaker plot and characterization, the film is enjoyable and satisfies Lord of the Rings fans and worth seeing
it on a large screen, no matter what version you see it in.
The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug and The
Hobbit: There and Back Again will be released late 2014 and 2015 respectively.
I'm worried about The Hobbit being stretched into three films - when I first heard this I thought The Hobbit is such a short book how can they stretch it that much? You know I am still looking forward to this adaptation but wondering if it is going to good enough. So pleased to read that you still liked it. It starts in Australia on Boxing Day and will be there to see just like all the rings movies.
ReplyDelete